SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Gau) 211

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
MANISH CHOUDHURY, J.
Nurul Islam Laskar, S/o Late Abdul Mannaf Laskar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Assam – Respondent
W.P.(C) 6339 of 2015
Decided on : 21-04-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. M.A. Choudhury, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. K. Goswami, Mr. H.I. Choudhury, Advocate

Point of Law: When the distribution network of the present petitioner and the respondent no. 3 Society, who has a number of fair price shop retailers under its aegis.

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - Assam Public Distribution of Articles Order, 1982 - Assam Co-operative Societies Act, 1949/2007 - Petroleum Act, 1934 - Petroleum Rules, 2002 - Public Distribution System - Oil Wholeseller - Granted License - Petitioner is a Sub-Wholeseller of S.K. Oil for which he has been granted a license under Assam Public Distribution of Articles Order, 1982 - Said license has been renewed from time to time - License has permitted petitioner to operate as a Sub-Wholeseller to carry on business of Sub-Wholeseller of notified article [S.K. Oil] in his area of operation - Petitioner challenging an order passed by respondent no. 2 i.e. Deputy Commissioner, Hailakandi whereby an earlier order passed by the respondent no. 2 has been kept in abeyance until further orders - Both orders are relatable to lifting of S.K. Oil under Public Distribution System.

Finding of the Court :

Petitioner's right to carry on business of S.K. Oil has not been interfered with - What has resulted from impugned order is reduction in quantity of S.K. Oil which was allowed to be lifted by him every month earlier - From materials on record, it has clearly emerged that present petitioner was earlier allowed to lift two quotas - One quota which was allotted to him as a Sub-Wholeseller licensee of S.K. Oil and other part which was allowed to be lifted by him, was quota originally and throughout meant for respondent no. 3 Society - It transpires from above sequence of events, impugned order might result in reduction in profit margins to present petitioner - Such reduction in profit margins to present petitioner which might be outcome of impugned order when placed in juxtaposition with public interests that is going to be served by granting opportunities to ultimate beneficiaries of S.K. Oil to get their allotted quotas from nearby fair price shops retailers operating under aegis of present respondent no.3 Society, it is element of public interests which should be given precedence over private interests of present petitioner.

Result: Petition dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioner challenging an order dated 05.01.2015 passed by the respondent no. 2 i.e. the Deputy Commissioner, Hailakandi whereby an earlier order dated 31.12.2014 passed by the respondent no. 2 has been kept in abeyance until further orders. Both the orders are relatable to lifting of S.K. Oil under the Public Distribution System [PDS].

2. The petitioner is a Sub-Wholeseller of S.K. Oil for which he has been granted a license under the Assam Public Distribution of Articles Order, 1982 [‘the Articles Order’, for short]. The said license has been renewed from time to time. The license has permitted the petitioner to operate as a Sub-Wholeseller to carry on the business of Sub-Wholeseller of the notified article [S.K. Oil] in his area of operation : Village – Algapur-V. On the other hand, the respondent is a Co-operative society registered under the provisions of the Assam Co-operative Societies Act, 1949/2007. The area of operation of the respondent no. 3 is also Village -Algapur-V.

3. The petitioner also has a licence to import and store Petroleum Class B products which includes S.K. Oil, not exceeding 25,000 litres for storage of Petroleum Class B product i.e. S.K. Oil, the petitioner has a storage shed located at Village - Algapur-V.

4. The events which have relevance for the purpose of considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, can be stated to have originated from the year 1996. From a letter dated 05.11.1996, it is noticed that the Assistant Director, In-charge, Food and Civil Supplies, Hailakandi wrote to the concerned S.K. Oil depot at Algapur-V to issue S.K. Oil allotted for the respondent no. 3 Society to the petitioner from the month of November, 1996 onwards. The Assistant Director, In-charge, Food and Civil Supplies, Hailakandi had also informed the Secretary of the respondent no. 3 Society to lift the allotted S.K. Oil for the Society from the S.K. Oil depot from that month onwards. At the same time, the petitioner was informed that he would lift S.K. Oil from S.K. Oil depot at Algapur-V and issue the same to the respondent no. 3 Society by maintaining proper accounts. At that point of time, the respondent no. 3 Society did not have any storage license to store S.K. Oil allotted to the respondent no. 3 Society.

5. On 06.06.2007, the In-charge, Zonal Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Cachar & Karimganj by his letter of even date had instructed the Assistant Registrars of Co-operative Societies under his jurisdiction to direct all the Gaon Panchayat Samabai Samittees [GPSSs] within their respective circles to lift S.K. Oil from S.K. Oil depot and to distribute/deliver the same to the agents/fair price shops from the storage of the respective GPSSs after obtaining necessary licence/permission from the concerned authority. It was pursuant to the said direction contained in the letter dated 06.06.2007, the Executive Committee of the respondent no. 3 Society by a resolution passed on 03.07.2007, decided to initiate necessary steps so that the respondent no. 3 Society can lift and distribute the S.K. Oil to the consumers under it through its own storage premises. After such resolution, the respondent no. 3 applied to the Deputy Commissioner, Hailakandi on 27.07.2007 to allow it to lift PDS S.K. Oil from S.K. Oil Depot directly and distribute amongst its agents from the storage of the respondent no. 3 Society and it had also sought for a storage licence for the respondent no. 3 Society. Acting upon the said application, the authorities processed the matter of issuance of Petroleum Class B storage licence in favour of the respondent no. 3 Society. The land particulars for the proposed S.K. Oil storage premises of the respondent no. 3 Society was verified under the directions of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Hailakandi.

6. When the application submitted by the respondent no. 3 Society for issuan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top