SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Gau) 316

ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA
MASUMA AHMED W/O AMINUR ISLAM AHMED – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ASSAM – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: M.R. KHANDAKAR.

JUDGMENT :

ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA, J.

1. Heard Mr. M.R. Khandakar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Ganesh Pegu, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1, 2, 4 and 5 being the authorities under the Elementary Education Department, Government of Assam and Ms. DD Barman, learned counsel for the respondent No. 3, Deputy Commissioner, Dhubri.

2. Considering the nature of the order to be passed, notice is not required to be served on the respondent No. 6 Smti Julfa Ahmed.

3. The petitioner is a language teacher in the Silghagri ME School in the Dhubri district having been appointed on 05.07.2006 and the respondent No. 6 Smti Julfa Ahmed is also a language teacher of the same school and was appointed on 20.12.2010. If the respective dates of appointments are correct, apparently the petitioner would be senior to the respondent No. 6 as a language teacher of the school.

4. When the language teacher of the school was not provincialised and on the other hand the social science and science teachers were provincialised, the petitioner instituted WP(C) 2398/2021 which was given a final consideration by the order dated 31.03.2021. By the said order, a direction was issued to th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top