ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Indrajit Rajkhowa and S/o Kula Rajkhowa – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India Rep. By The Comm. and Secy. To The Govt. Of India Ministry Of Home Affairs New Delhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. R. Deka learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. S. K. Medhi, learned CGC appearing for the Union of India.
2. Mr. R. Deka, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner Nos. 1, 4, 8, 10, 11, 14, 16, 17, 18 and 19 wants to withdraw their names from this writ petition with a liberty to file afresh if so advised. Prayer is allowed. Accordingly, Registry to correct the same including in the CIS system.
3. It is needless to say that the present decision shall not be applicable to the writ petitioner Nos. 1, 4, 8, 10, 11, 14, 16, 17, 18 and 19 as the said writ petitioners have withdrawn their names from the present writ petition with a liberty to approach this Court afresh.
4. The petitioners participated in a selection process for recruitment of Constable (GD) in Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs), NIA & SSF and Rifleman (GD) in Assam Rifles. Such selection process was initiated by Staff Selection Commission by its advertisement dated 21.07.2018. The petitioners belongs to ST categories and from North Eastern Region, more particularly from Assam.
5. The petitioners are aggrieved by non-inclusion of their names in the select list dtd.21.01.2
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.