SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Gau) 534

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
R.M. Chhaya, Soumitra Saikia, JJ.
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Rep. By Chairman-Cum-Managing Director, New Delhi And Anr. – Petitioners
Versus
Nipu Hazarika S/o Lt. Jonaram Hazarika and Ors. – Respondents
WP(C) 6669 of 2017
Decided On : 10-08-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. R Thadani, Mr. B. Pathak
For the Respondent: Mr H K Das

Point of Law : Tribunal has failed to appreciate provisions of the scheme and has also ignored the fact that the scheme of 1989 is not an ongoing one but was introduced as a one-time measure.

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 12, 226, 227 – Companies Act, 1956 – Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 – State - Power of High Courts to issue certain writs – Petitioners are a former part of Department of Tele Communications, Government of India - Petitioner, (BSNL), is a company incorporated under Companies Act, 1956 and is a State under Article 12 of Constitution of India Whether respondents fulfill eligibility criteria for applicability of scheme or not and has directly passed an order for considering case of respondents for conferment of temporary status - Tribunal has failed to appreciate provisions of scheme and has also ignored fact that scheme of 1989 is not an ongoing one but was introduced as a one-time measure (Para 7).

Findings of the Court :

Provisions of a scheme by way of one-time measure has to be read as it is and the same cannot be tinkered with by extending its provisions to suit a particular class of casual labourers. There is nothing on record to show, even remotely, that respondents fulfilled the eligibility criteria of the scheme. Thus, the Tribunal has committed error apparent on the face of the record in holding that the respondents were continuing in their engagement as casual labourers as although no such material has been produced by the respondents and, hence, such error is an obvious error on the part of the Tribunal -Tribunal has also as such given no reasons for coming to the conclusion that conferment of temporary status to respondents is justifiable - Tribunal has also not examined the main criteria of the scheme and, in absence of any material the Tribunal has given a general direction for applicability of scheme and such direction is based on no material.

Result : Writ petition allowed.

JUDGMENT :

R.M. Chhaya, J.

By this petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have challenged the legality and validity of the judgment dated 29.09.2015 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Tribunal’), Guwahati Bench, in Original Application No. 261/2013.

2. The following facts can be culled out from the record of the petition :

(i) That the petitioners are a former part of the Department of Tele Communications, Government of India. The petitioner no. 1, namely, Bharat Sanchal Nigam Limited (BSNL), is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 since 15.09.2000 and is a State under Article 12 of the Constitution of India. The basic facts arising in this petition relates back to the proceedings of WP(C) 302/1986 and WP(C) 273/1986, filed before the Hon’ble Apex Court by ‘Bharatia Dak Tar Mazdoor Manch’ for the cause of Daily Rated Casual Labourers employed under the Posts & Telegraph Department existing then. Vide a Circular dated 30.03.1985, issued by the Director General, Posts & Telegraphs, there was already a ban on fresh employment of casual labourers by Telecom Circles/Districts, which came into effect from 30.03.1985. The Hon’ble Apex Court by judgment dated 27.10.1987, reported in Daily Rated Casual Labour Employed Under P & T Department vs. Union of India and Others, reported in (1988) 1 SCC 122, directed the Union of India and others, who were party to the said petitions, to prepare a scheme on a rational basis for absorbing as far as possible the casual labourers who had been continuously working for more than one year in the Posts and Telegraph Department. Thus, a direction was issued for regularization of only such casual labourers who had been continuously working for more than one year on the date of the judgment and order of the Apex Court. As per the directions issued by the Hon’ble Apex Court, the Union of India and the Posts and Telegraph Department formulated a scheme for the same. The said scheme was named as the “Casual Labourers (Grant of Temporary Status and Regularization) Scheme of Department of Telecommunications, 1989” (hereinafter referred to as “1989 Scheme”), which was introduced vide a Circular No. 269-10/89-STN dated 07.11.1989. The said scheme was prepared to cover only those class of casual labourers who were already classified by laying down conditions to be read with the provisions of the scheme and Circular dated 30.03.1985. The Circular dated 07.11.1989 also provided that the scheme was a one-time scheme. The said scheme inter alia further provided that fresh recruitment and employment of casual labourer for any type of work in Telecom Circles/Districts should be stopped after 30.03.1985 and normally no casual labourer engaged after 30.03.1985 would be available for consideration for conferring temporary status. It also provided that in the unlikely event of there being any cases of casual labourers engaged after 30.03.1985 requiring consideration for conferment of temporary status, the same should be referred to the Telecom Commission with relevant particulars regarding the action taken against the officers under whose authorization the irregular engagement/non-retrenchment was resorted to. Thus, the scheme normally provided that no casual labourer who has been recruited after 30.03.1985 should be granted temporary status without specific approval from the office of the Telecom Commission. The said scheme came into force from 01.10.1989 onwards and the same was made applicable to the casual labourers employed by the Department of Telecommunications. The said scheme also provided various provisions relating to temporary status, entitlement, termination of service etc.

(ii) The record indicates that the Ministry of Telecommunications, vide a letter No. 269-4/93-STN dated 25.06.1993, issued a furt

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top