MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
Shilpa Kumari, D/o. Surendra Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Oil India Ltd – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. R.C. Borpatra Gohain, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S.N. Sarma, learned Senior Counsel for Oil India Limited.
2. The petitioner’s case in brief is that pursuant to an Advertisement dated 29.11.2018, issued by the Oil India Limited, for recruitment to the post of Superintending Medical Officer (Gynaecology), the petitioner applied for the said post. The marks allotted in the selection process, as reflected in the Advertisement dated 29.11.2018 were as follows :
| Selection | Total Marks | Qualifying Marks |
| Written Test | 100 | 50 |
| Group Discussion | 30 | 15 |
| Personal interview | 10 | 5 |
3. The petitioner took part in the Written Test on 17.03.2019 and secured 51 marks in the Written Test. The Personal Interview was held on 07.06.2019 and the petitioner secured 5 marks in the interview. No Group Discussion was held by the respondents. The petitioner thereafter undertook the Pre-Employment Medical Examination (PEME) on 10.06.2019 in terms of the extract of Clause – B of the Advertisement dated 29.11.2018, which st
Assam Public Service Commission & Ors. Vs. Pranjal Kumar Sarma & Ors.
Madan Mohan Sharma & Another vs. State of Rajasthan & Others
Mohd. Raisul Islam & Others vs. Gokul Mohan Hazarika & Others
Punjab State Electricity Board & Another Vs. Ashwani Kumar
Tez Prakash Pathak & Others vs. Rajasthan High Court and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.