SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Gau) 569

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Babita Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: R. Goswami.

JUDGMENT :

PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA, J.

1. Heard Mr. R. Goswami, learned counsel appearing for the appellant as well as Ms. A.G. Choudhury, learned counsel representing the respondents.

2. This is an appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (as amended) against the Judgment and Award dated 07.12.2018 passed by the MACT No. 2, Kamrup (M) Guwahati in MAC Case No. 492/2016.

3. The factual matrix leading to filing of this appeal lies within a very short campus. One person died in a motor accident. His wife, his father, his sister and his brother jointly filed a claim petition before the tribunal. The tribunal awarded a total compensation of Rs. 47,90,397/-. The tribunal further held that the father, brother and sister of the deceased are not his dependence and therefore, they are not entitled to any compensation.

4. The learned counsel Mr. Goswami has pointed out that though the tribunal had held that only the wife of the deceased is the dependent then 1/3 of the total yearly income of the deceased should not have been deducted on account of personal expenses of the deceased.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top