R. M. CHHAYA, ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA, SOUMITRA SAIKIA
Mustt Junufa Bibi, W/o. Late Tarif Uddin Ahmed – Appellant
Versus
Mustt Padma Begum @ Padma Bibi, W/o. Tarif Uddin Ahmed – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
A.M. Bujor Barua, J.
Heard Mr. Y.S. Mannan, learned counsel for the appellant Mustt Junufa Bibi. Also heard Mr. R.C. Saikia, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1 Mustt Padma Begum @ Padma Bibi, Ms. D. Borah, learned counsel for the respondents in the Health Department of the Government of Assam, Mr. A. Hassan, learned counsel for Accountant General, Assam, Ms. N. Sarma, learned counsel for the respondents in the Education Department as well as Mr. J.K. Goswami, learned additional senior Government Advocate for the respondents in the Pension Department. Further heard Mr. R.K.D. Choudhury, learned Dy.SGI for the authorities under the Union of India inasmuch as, in some of the matters where also the question referred is to be answered that the Union of India are respondents.
2. Junufa Bibi has instituted WA 160/2018 being aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 26.07.2017 in WP(C) No. 2182/2016. WP(C) No. 2182/2016 had been instituted by the respondent No. 1 Padma Begum @ Padma Bibi (hereinafter referred as Padma Begum) being aggrieved by the PPO No. 9011112044447 and GPO No. 11220444713 dated 30.09.2013 by which the appellant Junufa Bibi had been provided to be the bene
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.