Back
MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA
Jit Chabukdhara, S/o Lt. Babul – Appellant
Versus
State of AP Represented through the Public Prosecutor – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr. T. T. Tara, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Ms. L. Hage, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, for the respondent no. 1 as well as Mr. T. Taison, learned counsel for the respondent no.2.
2. This criminal petition has been registered on filing of an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by the petitioners, namely, (1) Sri Jit Chabukdhara, (2) Sri Goutam Bhattacharya, and (3) Sri Sumit Agarwal, praying for quashing of the proceeding of the CR Case No. 69/2022 under Sections 420/465/34 of the Indian Penal Code, which is pending before the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Capital Complex, Yupia, Arunachal Pradesh.
3. The facts relevant for consideration of the instant criminal petition, in brief, are as follow:-
In the year 2019, the petitione
The court affirmed that criminal proceedings cannot be used as leverage in civil disputes, emphasizing the need for proof of dishonest intent and necessary ingredients for offences claimed. Lack of v....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
