SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Gau) 1378

MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
Abdul Kayum Choudhury – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
M.H.Laskar, Advocate, S.P.Sharma, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA, J.

Heard Mr. M.H. Laskar, learned counsel for the petitioner, who prays that the petitioner's application dtd. 26/5/2001 for compassionate appointment should be considered by the respondents.

2. The petitioner's counsel submits that the petitioner's father died-in-harness on 2. The petitioner's counsel submits that the petitioner's father died-inharness on 13/7/1995. The petitioner's mother thereafter made an application for compassionate appointment in favour of the petitioner's elder brother, Shri Abdus Sattar Choudhury on 7/11/1995. The petitioner herein filed an application for compassionate appointment on 26/5/2001.

3. The petitioner's counsel submits that the petitioner's application should be considered by the Assam Power Distribution Company Limited (APDCL), in terms of the meeting dtd. 5/7/2021 chaired by the Hon'ble Chief Minister of Assam with senior Government officials, wherein it was decided that all pending applications for compassionate appointment prior to 2017 should be decided within 3 (three) months.

4. The petitioner's counsel submits that this Court in its order dtd. 24/9/2021 passed in WP(C) No. 4838/2021, had directed the State Gov

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top