MANISH CHOUDHURY
Hemanta Karmakar S/o Moni Mohan Karmakar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
MANISH CHOUDHURY, J.
1. The same writ petitioner has preferred both the writ petitions - W.P. (C) No. 7967/2022 & W.P. (C) No. 523/2023 - under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to challenge two separate tender processes initiated by the same authority, that is, Mission Director, Samagra Shiksha, Assam (the respondent No. 4 in both the writ petitions).
2. The tender process, as assailed in the writ petition, W.P. (C) No. 7967/2022 (hereinafter also referred to as ‘the 1st Writ Petition’ at places, for easy reference), has been initiated by a Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) dated 01.11.2022 for Tender No. GEM/2022/B/2693580. The concerned tender process, as challenged in the writ petition, W.P. (C) No. 523/2023 (hereinafter also referred to as ‘the 2nd Writ Petition’ at places, for easy reference), has been initiated by a Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) dated 13.01.2023 for Tender No. GEM/2023/B/2982233. Both the tender processes are initiated for procurement of Dual Desks and Benches.
2.1. In the both the writ petitions, the petitioner has made more or less similar pray
Michigan Rubber (India) Limited vs. State of Karnataka and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.