IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
NELSON SAILO, J.
Lalzarmawia Kawnpui – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Mizoram and Others – Respondents
W.P. (C) No. 69 of 2022
Decided On : 30-04-2024
Recruitment Rules - Promotion - Rules of 2012, Amendment Rules of 2015, Office Memorandum - Mizoram Urban Development & Poverty Alleviation Department - Rules of 2012, Amendment Rules of 2015, Rules of 2020
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a Junior Engineer, sought promotion to the post of Assistant Engineer based on the Rules of 2012 and its amendment. The Department rejected the promotion citing an Office Memorandum.
Finding of the Court:
The Court found that the Office Memorandum could not override the statutory provisions of the Recruitment Rules and directed the authorities to consider the petitioner for promotion against the vacancy that occurred on 21.10.2020.
Issues: Interpretation of Recruitment Rules, Validity of Office Memorandum, Eligibility for Promotion
Ratio Decidendi: The statutory provisions of the Recruitment Rules cannot be overridden by executive or administrative instructions. The petitioner was found eligible for promotion based on the Rules of 2020 and the Office Memorandum dated 04.10.2023.
Final Decision: The writ petition was allowed, and the authorities were directed to consider the petitioner for promotion to the post of Assistant Engineer against the vacancy that occurred on 21.10.2020.
2. Brief facts of the case essential for disposal of the writ petition may be noticed at the outset. The petitioner was appointed as Junior Engineer under the Directorate of Urban Development & Poverty Alleviation Department (UD&PA) on contract basis at a fixed monthly remuneration with effect from 12.11.2009 up to 28.02.2010 upon being recommended by the duly constituted DPC which held its meeting on 13.10.2009. The service of the petitioner was extended from time to time and consequently, he was regularized in service on the recommendation of the Mizoram Public Service Commission (MPSC) with effect from the date of joining the post by Notification dated 20.12.2016. Upon completion of probationary period successfully, which was for two (2) years, the petitioner along with another person were confirmed in service with immediate effect. The petitioner is also at S. No. 1 of the final seniority list of Junior Engineer in the Pay Level 7 of the Pay Matrix under the UD&PA Department.
3. The case of the petitioner is that the next promotion from the post of Junior Engineer is to the post of Assistant Engineer as per the Mizoram Urban Development & Poverty Alleviation Department (Group ‘A’ post) Recruitment Rules (Rules of 2012). As per the Rules of 2012, there are two (2) sanctioned post of Assistant Engineer and the method of recruitment is 50% by direct recruitment and remaining 50% by promotion, failing which, by deputation. The Rules of 2012 was amended by the Mizoram Urban Development & Poverty Alleviation Department (Group ‘A’ post) Recruitment (Amendment) Rules, 2015 (Amendment Rules of 2015). As per the said amendment, the sanctioned post has been increased to four (4) posts and the quota meant for direct recruitment is 75% and for promotion quota 25%, failing which, by deputation.
4. According to the petitioner, his contract service was regularized and therefore, he can count one third of the past service rendered on contract basis as permissible under the Mizoram Government Employees (Counting of Past Service) Rules, 2020 (Rules of 2020). Therefore, by adding up the services rendered on regular basis as well as the past service rendered on contract basis, the petitioner is eligible to be considered against the 25% quota earmarked for promotion to the post of Assistant Engineer. The proposal submitted by the UD&PA for considering the promotion of the petitioner was rejected by the Department of Personnel & Administrative Reforms (DP&AR) vide I.D dated 01.02.2021. The proposal for relaxation of the Office Memorandum concerned to facilitate the consideration of the promotion of the petitioner to the post of Assistant Engineer was also regretted through the impugned ID No. A.12018/44/2020-P&AR(GSW) dated 15.11.2021. While rejecting the same, the UD&PA Department was advised to fill up the post by way of deputation as per the impugned ID No. A.12018/44/2020-P&AR(GSW) dated 20.10.2021. Aggrieved, the petitioner is before this Court.
5. This Court while issuing notice of motion on 29.06.2022 had passed the interim order to the effect that the ID dated 20.10.2021 advising the Department to fill up the vacancy by way of deputation should not be acted upon till final disposal of the case. The interim order remains in operation till date.
6. Mr. A.R. Malhotra, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Rules of 2012 and the amended Rules of 2015 have been framed by the Governor of Mizoram in exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution of India and the same provides amongst others the method of recruitment for the post of Assistant Engineer and the percentage of the post to be filled up by way of direct recruitment and by promotion. The percentage of post to be filled up is 75% by direct recruitment and 25% by way of promotion and failing which, by way of deputation. He submi
Ajay Kumar Das vs. State of Orissa and Others
Pune Municipal Corporation and Another vs. Harkchand Misirimal Solanki and Others
Amended promotion rules' 45% quota for Junior Engineers with 7 years service contains no Diploma/Degree requirement; unqualified seniors eligible; DPC rejection on qualification grounds invalid.
Promotion is an incident of service and not a vested right of an employee.
Date on which the private respondents were placed in the Functional Post of the Senior Grade under PHE Department. On such consideration, if the petitioners are found eligible to be promoted or to be....
Point of law: Promotion to higher post is only an incident of service and no Government servant has a vested right to be promoted to higher post. To put it differently, though a Government servant ma....
The right for promotion has to be considered only in the light of the existing rules in force on the date of consideration to the next level of promotion.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.