SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Gau) 1069

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
MANISH CHOUDHURY, KAUSHIK GOSWAMI, JJ.
Leben Ramchiary - Appellant
Versus
The State of Assam, Represented by Public Prosecutor, Assam - Respondent
Criminal Appeal [J] No. 25 of 2022
Decided On : 01-08-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ms. B. Chowdhury, Amicus Curiae.
For the Respondent: Ms. A. Begum, Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam.

Extra-judicial confessions, if proven voluntary and corroborated by other reliable evidence, are valid for establishing guilt in murder cases.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 383 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302 and 300 - Criminal appeal against conviction for murder - The trial court found the accused guilty of uxoricide, sentencing him to life imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 2,000/-. The evidence included confessions made by the accused before villagers and the police, backed by strong circumstantial evidence and medical reports indicating sharp force injuries. (Paras 5, 12, 29, and 39)

(B) Evidentiary Standards for Confessions - An extra-judicial confession can be admissible if found voluntary, reliable, and corroborated by other evidence. The testimony of a child witness is also admissible if the witness shows an understanding of the events. (Paras 28 and 39)

Table of Content
1. overview of criminal case facts (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
2. court's considerations on confessions (Para 10 , 13 , 14 , 20 , 23 , 32 , 33)
3. arguments regarding evidentiary issues (Para 11 , 12)
4. legal standards for evaluating child witnesses (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 36)
5. final judgment and orders on appeal (Para 39 , 41 , 42)
6. final ruling and directives issued by the court. (Para 40)

JUDGMENT :

M. Choudhury, J.

The instant criminal appeal from jail under Section 383 , Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC] is preferred against a Judgment and Order dated 23.09.2021 passed by the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Baksa at Mushalpur in Sessions Case no. 50 of 2020, which arose out of Mushalpur Police Station Case no. 41/2020 and corresponding PRC Case no. 834/2020. In the trial before the learned Sessions Judge, Baksa, the accused-appellant faced a charge of murder under Section 302 , INDIAN PENAL CODE [IPC] and after the trial, the learned Sessions Judge, Baksa [‘the trial court’, for short] finding the accused-appellant guilty of uxoricide for committing the murder of his wife, has convicted him under Section 300 , IPC. After hearing him on the point of sentence under Section 235[2], IPC, the learned trial court has sentenced the accused-appellant under Section 302 , IPC to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/-, in default of payment of fine, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for further 6 [six] months.

2. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that investigation into the case, Mushalpur Police Station Case no. 41/2020 was launched on 20.05.2020 when one Amrit Brahma, as the informant, lodged a First Information Report [FIR] before the In-Charge, Nikashi Out Post on that day alleging that the accused was involved behind the murder of his wife, Phishi Ramchiary on 14.05.2020.

3. On receipt of the FIR, the In-Charge, Nikashi Out Post, Mukunda Das [P.W.11] registered the same at 10-00 a.m. as Nikashi Out Post General Diary Entry No. 339 dated 20.05.2020 and forwarded the FIR to the Officer In-Charge, Mushalpur Police Station for registering a case after proper sections of law. On receipt of the FIR, the Officer In-Charge, Mushalpur Police Station registered the FIR as Mushalpur Police Station Case no. 41/2020 for the offences under Section 302 , IPC and Section 201 , IPC. The In-Charge, Nikashi Out Post, Mukunda Das [P.W.11], a Sub-Inspector of Policehad already taken up the investigation of the case on being authorized by the Officer In-Charge, Mushalpur Police Station in reference to General Diary Entry no. 339.

4. In the FIR, the informant who also testified as P.W.2, had inter alia mentioned that on 20.05.2020, the accused, Leben Ramchiary, a resident of Village No. 2 Shantipur, Police Station – Mushalpur confessed before the Government Gaonburah, Somnath Sarma [P.W.3] to the effect that on 14.05.2020, he [the accused] had killed his wife, Phishi Ramchiary with a Khukuri over domestic issues and kept the body buried under the floor of his house.

5. In the course of investigation of the case, the I.O. [P.W.11] recorded statements of a number of witnesses under Section 161 , CrPC. The dead body of the deceased was also dug out from a place inside the house of the accused on 20.05.2020. After digging out the dead body, inquest proceeding was conducted at that place itself by an Executive Magistrate on 20.05.2020. Thereafter, the dead body of the deceased, Phishi Ramchiarywas forwarded to Dr. Ravi Boro Civil Hospital, Mushalpur on 20.05.2020 itself. The I.O. after going to the place of occurrence [P.O.], that is, the house of the accused took the accused into custody. The I.O., in the course of investigation, also made seizure of a Khukuri [a sharp cutting weapon], besides preparing a Sketch Map of the P.O.

6. After completing investigation into the case, Mushalpur Police Station Case no. 41/2020 [corresponding PRC Case no. 834/2020], the I.O. submitted a charge

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top