IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
N. Unni Krishnan Nair, J.
Varun Agarwal, S/O. Lt. Hanuman Prasad Agarwal And Anr – Petitioners
Versus
The State Of Assam, Rep. By The Addl. Chief Secretary To The To Govt. Of Assam, Revenue And Disaster Management Deptt., And Ors. – Respondents
WP(C)/200/2019
Decided On : 16-08-2024
Eviction - Government Land - Assam Land and Revenue Regulations, 1886 - Rule 3(ii), Rule 18(2) - The Court found the eviction notice issued by the Circle Officer without jurisdiction as the necessary delegation of power from the District Commissioner was not in place at the time of issuance.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners challenged an eviction notice for government land, claiming possession since 1982 and ongoing applications for settlement of the land. They argued the eviction notice was issued without jurisdiction as the Circle Officer lacked the necessary authority.
Finding of the Court:
The Court concluded that the eviction notice was issued without jurisdiction since the Circle Officer was not authorized to do so at the time of issuance, and directed the District Commissioner to process the petitioners' applications for land settlement.
Issues: Whether the eviction notice issued by the Circle Officer was valid given the lack of proper delegation of authority from the District Commissioner.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the eviction notice was invalid as it was issued by an officer without the requisite authority, emphasizing the need for proper delegation of powers under the relevant regulations.
Result: The eviction notice dated 20.12.2018 is set aside.
JUDGMENT :
N. Unni Krishnan Nair, J.
Heard Mr. S. Sharma, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. A. Gautam, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Ms. N. Bordoloi, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Revenue and Disaster Management Department representing the respondents no. 1 & 2 and Mr. N. Goswami, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents no. 3, 4 & 5.
2. The challenge made in the present proceeding is to an eviction notice dated 20.12.2018, issued by the Circle Officer, Dispur Revenue Circle, requiring the petitioners to vacate the Government land possessed by them within 15 days from receipt of the said notice.
3. The facts requisite for adjudication of the issue arising in the present proceeding are noticed as under:
4. It is projected in the writ petition that the father of the petitioner had brought the Possessory Right of a Government land, measuring 03 Katha, 11 Lechas, covered by Dag No. 1289 in the year 1982 from one Nayan Lingdo, whose father possessed the said land since 1973. On the said transaction so occasioning, the father of the petitioners possessed the land in question and renovated the existing room, while also constructing new rooms. It is projected that the said land and houses constructed thereon, were earlier assessed by the Guwahati Municipal Corporation (GMC) in the name of Nayan Lingdo and after the possession thereof, by the father of the petitioners, such Holding No. 56 of Ward No. 33(old)/56(new) was so issued in his favour. After the death of the father of the petitioners, the mother of the petitioners possessed the said land along with the petitioners, herein, continuously. Accordingly, the Holding No. 56 being assessed in the name of the mother of the petitioners, the taxes so working out were being regularly paid in the matter. The GMC Holding Nos. pertaining to the houses so constructed over the said plot of land, as on today, is 10272120 of Ward No. 30.
5. The petitioners, who are siblings, contend that neither their parents nor they, have no landed property other than the said plot of land so possessed by them. Accordingly, the petitioners contended that being landless persons, they have filed separate applications, being applications No. 330 and 331, both dated 04.11.2006 respectively; for settlement of the said plot of land, measuring 01 Katha, 10 Lechas each; totaling 03 Kathas before the District Commissioner, Kamrup. It is contended by the petitioners that the said applications as submitted by them, was duly processed by the authorities and necessary clarifications with regard to the land possessed by the petitioners were also received from the Guwahati Metropolitan Developmental Authority.
6. The petitioners contend that their claim for settlement of the land in question under their possession is being currently considered by the respondent authorities in Case No. KRS-1036/2006 and KRS-1037/2006. It is contended that a final decision thereon, has not been arrived at, till date.
7. Poised thus, the petitioners received an eviction notice dated 20.12.2018, issued by the Circle Officer, Dispur Revenue Circle; wherein they were contended to be occupying Government land by constructing concrete wall and tin roof houses and accordingly, they were asked to vacate the said Government land within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of the notice, failing which, it was provided that eviction proceeding under the provisions of Rule 18(2) of the Assam Land and Revenue Regulations, 1886, (hereinafter referred to as “the Regulations of 1886”) would be so carried out.
8. On receipt of the said eviction notice dated 20.12.2018; the petitioners submitted a representation before the Circle Officer, Dispur Revenue Circle and inter-alia, contended therein, that they had submitted applications praying for settlement of the land under their possession with them and the same is under process for being placed before the jurisdictional Land Advisory Committee for ne
The court ruled that eviction without a hearing violates the principles of natural justice and Article 21 of the Constitution.
Point of Law : Amended provisions of Rule 18 (2) of the Settlement Rules does not mandate issuance of any notice upon persons coming in the ambit of the said sub-rule. The petitioner are admittedly i....
Eviction notices pertaining to Government land must respect principles of natural justice, treating them as Show Cause Notices, allowing occupants to present their claims and ensuring personal hearin....
Eviction notices under Rule 18 of the Assam Land and Revenue Regulations must afford petitioners an opportunity to demonstrate bona fide claims of right, adhering to principles of natural justice.
Eviction notices must respect principles of natural justice, allowing individuals to present claims before taking any action against their occupancy of Government land.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the dispute between the petitioners' claim as landholders and the claim of unauthorized occupation by the Estate Officer should be decided by ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.