Judges : J.M.JAMES
N.Shamsul Hunda, Thiruvannoor, Kozhikode - Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala, Represented by its Chief Secretary, Thiruvananthapuram - Respondent
Case No : WP(C).No.27765 of 2005(E)
Decided On : 02/09/2007
Advocates Appeared :
For the Petitioners : O.V. Radhakrishnan (SR), Babu Joseph Kuruvathazha, K.I. Sageer, Advocates. For the Respondents: George Joseph, Addl. CGSC, K.G. Bhaskaran, Government Pleader.
Probation - Kerala Forest Service - K.S. & S.S.R - Rule 20A
Fact of the Case:
The writ petitioners sought the declaration of their probation and consequential reliefs after completing the required period of probation as per the Special Rules for the Kerala Forest Service and the Kerala State and Subordinate Service Rules (K.S. & S.S.R). The first respondent had not declared their probation despite their completion of the prescribed period.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the writ petitioners had completed their probation period and were entitled to have their probation declared and be confirmed in the cadre of Forest Range Officer. The court also held that the reasons given for not declaring the probation and confirming the service were not legally sustainable.
Issues: The main issue was whether the non-declaration of probation would prevent the writ petitioners from further promotion and whether Rule 20A of the K.S. & S.S.R would apply in this case.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on various legal principles and precedents to establish that the writ petitioners should have been deemed to have completed their probation and be confirmed in their positions. The court also interpreted Rule 20A of the K.S. & S.S.R and found it to be inapplicable in the given circumstances.
Final Decision: The court directed the first respondent to declare the probation of the writ petitioners in the category of the Assistant Conservator of Forests and confirm them with consequential benefits. The second writ petitioner was also granted all benefits and appointment by promotion to the Indian Forest Service, notwithstanding his retirement.
The writ petitioners are before this Court with the complaint that their probation had not been declared by the first respondent, although they have completed the required period of probation, as contemplated under the Special Rules for the Kerala Forest Service, in short ‘the Special Rules’, and also as per the relevant rules relating to the declaration of probation under the Kerala State and Subordinate Service Rules, in short ‘the K.S. & S.S.R’. Hence pray that the first respondent may be directed to declare their probation, and issue orders granting consequential reliefs.
2. The question that arise for consideration in this writ petition is whether an employee who had, though successfully completed the prescribed or extended period of probation, on the appointed post, but not having been declared of probation, and continuing in service with higher grade conferred, could later be denied of further promotion, on the employee not having duly completed the probation, and also whether Rule 20A of the K.S. & S.S.R would come to the aid of the Government in not declaring the probation of an employee.
3. The brief facts required for the disposal of the writ petition are that, the writ petitioners have been appointed as Forest Range Officer in the Forest Department, by the Government, as per the order, dated 19.11.1976, of the Chief conservator of Forests (Development). They had joined the service on 19.11.1976 itself. After the practical training, they were appointed as Probationary Ranger, under the direct recruitment vacancies. They have successfully completed their probation, and had been declared as having satisfactorily completed the probation, as per the proceedings, dated 30.9.1984, in respect of the first writ petitioner, and on 20.4.1984, in respect of the second writ petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petitioners were confirmed in the cadre of Forest Range Officer, with effect from 19.11.1976, the date of entry into the service.
4. The names of the writ petitioners were thereafter included in the select list of officers of Forest Department for promotion against the vacancies of Assistant Conservator of Forests, as prepared by the Departmental Promotion Committee (Higher), which met on 3.4.1995. The first respondent has approved the same and the said list was published in the Kerala Gazette Extra Ordinary, dated 24.5.1995, as could be seen from Ext.P2. The names of the writ petitioners figure as Sl.Nos.1 and 2 under the select list, for the year 1994-95.
5. As per the Government Order, dated 21.8.1995, the writ petitioners were appointed by transfer to the post of Assistant Conservator of Forests, as could be seen from Ext.P3, Serial Nos.1 and 2 therein being the writ petitioners. They have joined the post on 28.8.1995. Therefore, under Rule 6(b)(ii) of the Special Rules, the Assistant Conservator shall, if recruited by transfer, be on probation for a total period of two years on duty within a continuous period of three years.
6. Though the probation of the writ petitioners had not been declared, as required under Rule 6(b)(ii) of the Special Rules, the writ petitioners continued to work in the post of Assistant Conservator of Forests. Under Ext.P4 order, dated 9.1.2003, they had been granted the senior grade in the post of Assistant Conservator of Forests. Ext.P4 further reveal that the Assistant Conservators of Forests, under Sl.Nos.42 to 87 therein, were granted Senior Grade on different dates, the first writ petitioner, with effect from 1.7.2001 and the second writ petitioner, with effect from 1.10.2001, (Sl.Nos.84 and 85). Thus although the probation, as required under the Special Rules, is for a period of two years, in a continuous period of three years, without declaring the probation and passing any orders, they were granted senior grade in Assistant Conservators of Forest.
7. The Special Rules only state that the Assistant Conservator, if recruited by transfer, shall be on probation, for a period of two yea
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.