SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Ker) 202

R.BASANT
Mony, M. A. – Appellant
Versus
Leelamma, M. P. – Respondent


Judgment :-

Does the availability of alternative options for grievance redressal, deprive the aggrieved person of her right to approach the Magistrate with a petition under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act? Does this Court have power to direct transfer of a petition under Sec. 12 pending before the Magistrate to a Family Court, where another dispute between the same parties is pending? These questions arise for consideration in these petitions. I am satisfied and both counsel agree that this transfer petition and the Crl.M.C. can be disposed of by a common order. Accordingly, I have taken up both these matters together for consideration.

2. The first respondent in these petitions is admittedly the wife of the petitioner herein. The marriage had taken place as early as on 8-11-1977. The parties are living separately from 11-4-1982. It is unnecessary to refer to the prior history of litigations between the parties. Suffice it to say that at the moment two petitions are pending before the Family Court at Kottayam. The first is for divorce filed by the petitioner herein and the second is an Original Petition claiming an amount of Rs. 36,55,000 under vario


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top