SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Ker) 254

THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN
Jayanthi, M. – Appellant
Versus
Surendra Manjeswar – Respondent


Judgment :-

Petitioner challenges Exts.P-11, P-14 and P-17 orders which are referable to the provisions of the Kerala Land Conservancy Act, 1957, hereinafter referred to as the "Conservancy Act", the Kerala Land Conservancy Rules, 1958, hereinafter referred to as the "Conservancy Rules", the Kerala Government Land Assignment Act, 1960, "the Assignment Act", for short, and the Kerala Land Assignment Rules, 1964, "the Assignment Rules" for short.

2. Petitioner is the daughter of the sister of respondents 1 and 5 and thus, the granddaughter of Panchi and Korapaly.

3. 47 cents in R.S. 87/9 and 20 cents in R.S. 87/8 of Manjeswar Village were assigned to Panchi and his wife Korapaly in 1936. As they failed to pay land tax due on the land, the assignment was cancelled in 1937. No documents were there to show that the above cancellation of the assignment was with notice to them or that the cancellation was known to the assignees. On 20-4-1959, the assignees filed application for the issuance of permanent patta. By letter dated 15-5-1959, Panchi, the applicant, was directed to file an application in the prescribed form stating that "the petitioner is informed that claim for patta land will be






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top