SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Ker) 625

THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN
Ajith – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Judgment :-

Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J.

These Writ Petitions relate to the recruitment of Munsiff-Magistrates in the Kerala Judicial Service.

2. By the Kerala Judicial Service Rules, 1991, hereinafter called the "Special Rules", for short, which came into force with effect from 1-1-1992, a common service called "The Kerala Judicial Service" was constituted in the place of the then existing Kerala Civil Judicial Service and the Kerala Criminal Judicial Service. The officers in Category No.2 as per R.3(2) of the Special Rules are the Munsiff-Magistrates.

3. R.5 of the Special Rules provides that direct recruitment and transfer, in the manner provided in sub-r.(3) of that Rule, shall be the methods of appointment to the category of Munsiff-Magistrates. Out of every four vacancies arising in that category, the first, second and third vacancies are to be filled by direct recruitment and the fourth vacancy is to be filled by transfer from among the eight categories enlisted under sub-r.(3) of R.5. In the absence of suitable and qualified persons for appointment by transfer, the vacancies reserved for such appointment shall also he filled up by direct recruitment.

4. As per R.10(1) of the





























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top