SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Ker) 279

M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR
Kottangoodan Mohammed – Appellant
Versus
K. Saidalavi – Respondent


Judgment :-

Appellant instituted O.S.4 of 1985 before Munsiff Court, Parappanangadi seeking a decree for partition and allotment of his share in the plaint B schedule property having an extent of 2.42 acres in R.S.223/1 of Cherukad Village of Eranad Taluk. Respondents 1 and 2 filed O.S.299 of 1984 seeking a decree for permanent prohibitory injunction in respect of the same property contending that the property belongs to them absolutely. Plaint B schedule property admittedly originally belonged to deceased Pathummakutty Umma having obtained it on lease. Appellant is the son of Pathummakutty Umma in her first husband. Respondents 1 to 3 are the children born to her in her second marriage. Appellant contended that on the death of Pathummakutty Umma, plaint B schedule property devolved on all the legal heirs and therefore he is entitled to 2/7 shares and 3rd respondent is entitled to 1 /7 shares and respondents 1 and 2, 2/7 shares each. Respondents contended that plaint B schedule property is not available for partition as under Ext.A-3 gift deed executed on 23-1-1963, Pathummakutty Umma had gifted the properties to respondents 1 and 2 and the gift deed was acted upon and accepted by


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top