SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Ker) 153

PIUS C.KURIAKOSE
C. L. Cleetus – Appellant
Versus
The South Indian Bank Ltd. – Respondent


Judgment :-

The 1st judgment-debtor in a decree obtained by the 1st respondent, the South Indian Bank impugns in this Writ Petition filed under Article 227, Exts.P1 and P2 orders passed by the execution court. Ext.P1 is the common order passed on execution applications for setting aside ex parte order and for condonation of delay. Ext.P2 is the order passed on an execution application filed by the signatory to this Writ Petition seeking his impleadment as the next friend of the 1st judgment-debtor.

2. I have heard the submissions of Mr.T.Krishnanunni, learned counsel for the petitioner and also those of Sri.K. Prabhakaran, learned Standing Counsel for the 1st respondent Bank.

3. Sri.T.Krishnanunni would flay both Ext.P1 and Ext.P2. As regards Ext.P1, the learned counsel would submit that the learned Subordinate Judge was not justified in dismissing the applications filed by the petitioner on the ground of delay. There really was no delay and the condonation application was filed only by way of abundant caution. According to the learned counsel, ex parte orders contemplated under Rule 105(3) of Order XXI CPC are orders finally disposing of the execution petition and not orders setting













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top