SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Ker) 332

Judges : H.L.DATTU,K.T.SANKARAN
Abdul Vahid - Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Tahsildar (R.R) - Respondent
Case No : WA.No. 1628 of 2007
Decided On : 07/05/2007
Advocates Appeared :
For the Petitioner: S. Abdul Razzak, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1 & R2, Muhammed Rafiq, Senior Government Pleader.

Headnote:

Kerala General Sales Tax Rules 1963 -Rule. 6 -Kerala General Sales Tax Act appellant is a surety to the 3rd respondent and he executed Ext.P3 bond as directed by the sales tax authorities under R.6 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Rules Ext.P3 shows that the liability of the surety is to a tune of Rs.1 lakh sum of more than Rs.23 lakhs is due from the 3rd respondent as sales tax arrears. Revenue recovery proceedings were initiated against the appellant as well -Held,R.6(1) applies where the assessing authority is of the opinion that a dealer who has applied for registration or has been registered or has applied for renewal of registration should furnish security or additional security for the proper payment of tax security is to be given for the amount not exceeding one-half of the tax payable on the turnover of the dealer for the year as estimated by the authority -Writ Appeal fails and it is dismissed.

Judgment :-

The 3rd respondent is a dealer registered under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act (for short the Act). The appellant is a surety to the 3rd respondent and he executed Ext.P3 bond as directed by the sales tax authorities under rule 6 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Rules (the Rules for short). Ext.P3 shows that the liability of the surety is to a tune of Rs.1 lakh. A sum of more than Rs.23 lakhs is due from the 3rd respondent as sales tax arrears. Revenue recovery proceedings were initiated against the appellant as well.

2. The writ petition was filed by the appellant herein praying for the following relief’s:

“i. issue a writ of certiorari or other appropriate writ, direction or order calling for the records leading to Exhibit P5 demand notice and quashing the same;

ii. issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, direction or order directing the1st and 2nd respondents to abstain from enforcing any demand against the petitioner beyond one half of the tax assessed on the 3rd respondent for the relevant year of registration certified in Ext.P2 or the sum assured in Ext.P3, whichever is less;

iii) pronounce that the assessing authority has to issue demand notice to the guarantors for the sum assured before proceeding to enforce the contract of guarantee by opting Revenue Recovery Act;

iv) issue such other writ, direction or order as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and to allow this Original Petition with the petitioner's costs."

3. Rule 6 of the KGST Rules reads as follows:

"Security to be furnished by certain dealers.-

(1) Where the assessing authority is of the opinion that a dealer who has applied for registration or has been registered or has applied for renewal of registration should furnish security or additional security for the proper payment of the tax payable by him, the said authority, may direct him in writing to furnish, within such time as may be fixed by the said authority security for an amount, not exceeding one half of the tax payable on the turnover of the dealer for the years as estimated by it or three months, compounded amount in the case of dealers who have opted to pay tax under Section 7. In making such estimate the said authority shall take into account the taxable turnover of the dealer, if any, during the preceding years, the trend of business at the time the estimate is made, the nature of the goods dealt in by him and such other factors as may, in the opinion of the said authority, assist it in making a proper estimate.

(2) Such security may be furnished by the dealer in any of the following ways, namely: (a) by depositing as security in the Government Treasury the amount fixed by the said authority; or (b) by depositing with the said authority Government securities for the amount fixed by the said authority; or (c) by depositing security amount in the Post Office Savings Bank and pledging the Pass book to and depositing it with, the said authority; or (d) by furnishing to the said authority a guarantee from a Bank, approved in this behalf by the said authority, agreeing to pay to the State Government, on demand, the amount of security fixed by the said authority; or (e) by furnishing two sureties acceptable to the said authority by executing a security bond for such amount in Form 6. (f) by a bond prescribed under rule 42 for the amount fixed by the said authority in Form No.39 duly registered along with title, possession and valuation certificates obtained from the Tahsildar concerned and the value of property shall not be lower than the amount, shown in the bond. Explanation.- In the case of security furnished in Form No.6, surety must be solvent enough for the amount assured.

(3) The security furnished shall be maintained in full so long as the registration certificate continues to be in force and may in the event of default f payment of any tax be liable to adjustment towards such tax after due intimation." The contention of


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top