SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Ker) 452

K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, V.K.MOHANAN
Francis Jude Netto – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Judgment :-

K.S. Radhakrishnan, J.

W.P.C. No.26852 of 2006 was preferred by the appellant herein seeking a writ of certiorari to quash the notice issued by the District Collector inviting applications from qualified advocates for appointment as District Government Pleaders and Public Prosecutors and Additional Government Pleaders and Additional Public Prosecutors in the Kollam district and for a declaration that the petitioner's service as Additional District Government Pleader and Additional Public Prosecutor, Fast Track Court (Adhoc III), Kollam is not liable to be terminated till the expiry of three years period mentioned in his appointment order. Learned single Judge found no illegality in the steps taken to terminate his service and dismissed the Writ Petition. Aggrieved by the same W.A.No.1633 of 2007 was preferred. Against the interim order passed by the learned single Judge W.A. No.1358 of 2007 was preferred.

2. Petitioner was appointed as Additional Government Pleader and Additional Public Prosecutor at Fast Track Court (Adhoc III), Kollam as per order dated 23.06.2005. His service was terminated as per order G.O.(Ms) No.113/07/Law dated 7.6.07 and the District Collector too





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top