Raising several attractive questions including the question whether a decree can be executed any number of times even after full satisfaction has been recorded in earlier execution proceedings, the judgment debtor has filed this Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, impugning Ext.P1 order passed by the Additional Munsiff's Court, Neyyattinkara. The decree against the petitioner was one of declaration of the respondents' title and possession over the decree schedule property having an extend of 38 cents and shown in Ext.C1 (a) plan as STJK plot, a prohibitory injunction restraining the petitioner from trespassing into the above property and from interfering in any manner with respondents' title and possession over the property. The decree is also for fixation of boundaries permits putting up of boundary along with the line KJ under the supervision of an Advocate Commissioner. The petitioner alleges that in a previous execution petition, namely EP No.223 of 2006, the work of putting up of boundary was executed under the supervision of an Advocate Commissioner with the assistance of the Surveyor and that execution petition was closed after recording