SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Ker) 528

V.RAMKUMAR
Meenakshi – Appellant
Versus
Udayakumar – Respondent


Judgment :-

The revision petitioner, who is the complainant in S.T.No.143/06 on the file of JFCM-II, Haripad, challenges the order dated 5.2.07 passed by the said Magistrate returning the complaint presumably under section 201 Cr.P.C. for presenting a same before the proper court having jurisdiction within two weeks.

2. The above private complaint was filed against the first respondent accused alleging the commission of an offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in respect of a cheque bearing No.509004 drawn on the Pallickal Branch of the State Bank of India for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- allegedly issued by the accused to discharge his liability towards a loan said to have been availed by him from the revision petitioner/complainant.

3. The learned Magistrate took cognizance of the offence and recorded the sworn statement of the complainant and took the case on file as S.T.No.143/2006. On receipt of summons, the accused entered appearance. The trial of the case was later on commenced. After the evidence in the case was over, the accused was examined under section 313 Cr.P.C. and the case was posted for arguments when the first respondent accused, for the f






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top