SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Ker) 582

J.B.KOSHY, A.K.BASHEER, K.P.BALACHANDRAN
Saramma Itticheriya – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Judgment :-

Koshy, J.

Three questions arising out of interpretation of Section 49(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1804 (in short 'the Act') were referred to the Full Bench for consideration by a Division Bench of this court. These questions are:

"1. Has Collector vested with power to reject the claim under Section 49(1) put forward by the owner to acquire entire building and proceed with acquisition of part of the building without court interventions?

2. Whether tenant can file a writ petition challenging the action taken by the Collector when the option under Section 49(1) is exercised by the landlord?

3. When the Collector accepted the option to acquire the entire building, whether only building materials are to be acquired or the entire building including the land where it is situated also need be acquired?"

2. W.P. (C) No. 5512 of 2006 was filed by the owner of the building situated in survey No.1254/1 of Vanchiyoor village, Thiruvananthapuram. A notification under section 4 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act was published for acquiring part of the land and building owned by the petitioner. Thereafter, declaration under section 4 (6) was also published according to law. Later, petition

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top