SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Ker) 128

K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, K.T.SANKARAN
Vinaya Nair – Appellant
Versus
Corporation of Kochi, Represented By Its Secretary – Respondent


Judgment :-

Radhakrishnan, J.

This matter has been placed before us on a reference made by a learned single Judge having expressed doubt with regard to the correctness or otherwise of the learned single Judge’s Judgment in Ramesh Kumar v. Kannapuram Grama Panchayat, 1997 (2) KLT 434 wherein the learned single Judge took the view that the Hindu Marriage Act, 1956 would apply to a Hindu outside the territory of India only if he is a Hindu domiciled in the territory of India and that he should have permanent residence in India.

2. Petitioners herein are husband and wife who belong to Nair community. Their marriage was solemnized on 13-7-2005 at Vinayaka Kalyan Mandapam at Ernakulam in accordance with the provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act. First petitioner husband is employed at Canada and second petitioner his wife is a native of Kannur District in Kerala. First petitioner’s parental home is at Thodupuzha and parents own properties there. First petitioner was born while parents were at Canada. Consequently he acquired Canadian citizenship by birth and therefore he has a Canadian domicile by birth. First petitioner, a Hindu by birth and who professes Hindu Religion has married the sec




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top