K.THANKAPPAN
V. Geetha – Appellant
Versus
V. Sarada – Respondent
Plaintiff in O.S.No.73/1992 on the file of the Sub Court, Manjeri is the appellant. The suit was filed for partition of the plaint "B" schedule property. As per the plaint averments, Parangodan, grand-father of appellant and respondents, had acquired the plaint schedule properties as per registered assignment deed No.4052/1948. The said Parangodan had two male children namely, Kundu and Raman. After the death of Parangodan, the property devolved upon his sons, Kundu And Raman. They partitioned the property as per partion deed No.2692/1953 and ever since Raman was in possession and enjoyment of the plaint "B" schedule property. Raman died in the year 1963. His legal representatives are his wife, appellant and respondents. Later his wife died in 1967. Thus, the plaint schedule property devolved upon the appellant and the respondents. The 3rd respondent, the only male son of Raman, has been managing the plaint schedule property on behalf of appellant and other respondents. The appellant requested the respondents for partition of the plaint schedule property and separate allotment of her share. Since the respondents were not amenable, she sent registered notice for partitio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.