SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Ker) 131

KURIAN JOSEPH
P. Rohini – Appellant
Versus
P. Kumaran – Respondent


Judgment :-

The period of validity of a driving licence is the issue raised in this writ petition. In the impugned Ext.P2 award in O.P.(MV)No.1092/1996 on the files of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Thalassery it was found that there is violation of the permit and policy conditions since the validity of the driving licence of the driver was only upto 9-12-1995. The accident took place on 6-1-1996. The renewal of licence is only on 15-1-1996. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners-owner and driver, is that the licence is effective for a period of 30 days from the expiry. The contention of learned counsel appearing for the respondent Insurance Company is that since the licence was renewed on 15-1-1996, the effect is only from the data of renewal and hence the driver involved in the accident which took place on 6-1-1996 did not have valid licence at that time and hence there is violation of permit policy. In order to appreciate the rival contentions it is necessary to refer to two provisions-Sections 14 and 15 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Section 14 reads as follows:

“14. Currency of licences to licences to drive motor vehicles.-(1) A learner’s licence iss















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top