SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Ker) 104

K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, K.T.SANKARAN
K. M. Khadeeja – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector – Respondent


Judgment :-

K.S. Radhakrishnan, J.

The question that is posed for consideration in these case is whether the amount of penalty could be recovered under Section 142 (1) (c) (i) of the Customs Act read with Kerala Revenue Recovery Act against the personal properties left behind by the defaulters for an offence of smuggling which is against the national interest?

2. Petitioner in O.P.Nos.21354 of 1999 and 28882 of 2002 are the son and daughter of one late Kallatra Abdul Khader Haji and the petitioner in O.P.No.20917 of 1999 is the wife of one late M.B. Moosa. The reliefs sought for in all the original petitions are identical. Petitioners have sought for a declaration that they are not liable to pay the penalty due from their predecessors' interest and that the movable and immovable properties are not liable to be proceeded with for the recovery of the amounts due from late Abdul Khader Haji and Moosa respectively.

3. Customs Authorities had intercepted a fishing boat on 22.3.1974 from Neeleswaram coast with 86 silver ingots said to be illegally transported from Neeleswaram to a foreign country. Enquiry conducted had revealed that husband of the petitioner in O.P.No.20917 of 1999 by same























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top