K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, K.T.SANKARAN
K. M. Khadeeja – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector – Respondent
K.S. Radhakrishnan, J.
The question that is posed for consideration in these case is whether the amount of penalty could be recovered under Section 142 (1) (c) (i) of the Customs Act read with Kerala Revenue Recovery Act against the personal properties left behind by the defaulters for an offence of smuggling which is against the national interest?
2. Petitioner in O.P.Nos.21354 of 1999 and 28882 of 2002 are the son and daughter of one late Kallatra Abdul Khader Haji and the petitioner in O.P.No.20917 of 1999 is the wife of one late M.B. Moosa. The reliefs sought for in all the original petitions are identical. Petitioners have sought for a declaration that they are not liable to pay the penalty due from their predecessors' interest and that the movable and immovable properties are not liable to be proceeded with for the recovery of the amounts due from late Abdul Khader Haji and Moosa respectively.
3. Customs Authorities had intercepted a fishing boat on 22.3.1974 from Neeleswaram coast with 86 silver ingots said to be illegally transported from Neeleswaram to a foreign country. Enquiry conducted had revealed that husband of the petitioner in O.P.No.20917 of 1999 by same
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.