SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Ker) 199

K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, K.M.JOSEPH
M. P. Sivasankaran Nair – Appellant
Versus
The State of Kerala – Respondent


Judgment :-

Radhakrishnan, J.

These revision petitions were preferred under section 41 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 against an order passed by the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal in TA.1 of 2001 and TA.2 of 2001 respectively. Learned Government Pleader raised a preliminary objection that these revision partitions are not maintainable since the assessee is challenging the orders passed by the Tribunal dismissing a petition for condonation of delay in filing an appeal before the Tribunal under Section 39(1) of the KGST Act.

2. Petitioner is an assessee on the files of Sales Tax Officer, Nilambur. For disposal of these cases we may refer the facts in STRV.109 of 2004. Assessment order relates to the year 1995-96. Appeal was preferred before the Tribunal with a petition for condonation of delay of 159 days in filing the appeal. Various reasons were stated by the assessee for condoning the delay. Tribunal found no acceptable reasons and dismissed the petition for condonation of delay and consequently appeal was also dismissed. Same is the case in STRV. 202 of 2004.

3. Question to be decided is whether these revision petitions are maintainable under section 41 of the KGST Act when












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top