THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN
Bank of India – Appellant
Versus
Asst. Provident Fund Commissioner – Respondent
Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J.
The petitioner, hereinafter referred to as the "bank", is a banking company governed by the Banking Companies (Acquisition & Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970. Respondents 2 to 5 are its debtors, who have executed security documents creating equitable mortgages over immovable properties, in favour of the Bank.
2. The debt that respondents 2 to 5 owes to the bank is a "security debt" as defined under S.2(ze) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Industrial Act, 2002, hereinafter referred to as the "SARFAESI Act." The bank is thus a "secured creditor as defined in S.2(zd) having a "Security interest", as defined in S.2(zf), over the mortgaged property, which is a "security asset" in terms of S.2(zc) of the SARFAESI Act.
3. The second respondent going by its activities, is an establishment covered under S.1(3)(b) of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, hereinafter referred to as "EPF Act" and respondents 3 to 5, being its Managing Director/Director, are "employers" in relation to the said establishment, as defined in S.2(e) of the EPF Act. The said establishme
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.