SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Ker) 200

R.BHASKARAN
Kamalam – Appellant
Versus
Devaki – Respondent


Judgment :-

R. Bhaskaran, J.

This second appeal is filed by defendants 1 and 3 to 5 in O.S.No.94 of 1986 on the file of the Subordinate Judge's Court, Vadakara. The suit was for partition of plaint A and B-schedule properties and allotment of 1/10 share in plaint A-schedule and 1/16 share in plaint B-schedule to the plaintiff. The suit was filed on the basis that the property described in plaint A-schedule belonged to the father of the plaintiff Pokkinan. He executed a Will on 25-9-1952 bequeathing the property in favour of the plaintiff and her children, who are defendants 6 to 8 and 11 to 15. According to the plaintiff, all the children of Pokkinan are entitled to equal share in plaint A-schedule property and therefore 1/10 share was claimed by the plaintiff. Plaint B-schedule property was admittedly set apart to the thavazhi of the plaintiff and her children as per partition deed of the year 1954 and the plaintiff prayed for partition of 1/16 share, defendants 1 to 15 being the other members of the thavazhi. Defendants 1 to 5 contended that as per the Will of the father, the bequest was in favour of the thavazhi of plaintiff and defendants and all the members of the thavazhi are








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top