SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Ker) 248

K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR
Malayala Manorama Company Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner (KGST), Commercial Taxes – Respondent


Judgment :-

The petitioner is a Company, registered under the Companies Act and is engaged in the business of printing and publication of a daily newspaper and other publications. It is a registered dealer, under the K.G.S.T. and C.S.T. Acts, on the files of the 1st respondent. For printing newspaper and other journals, printing ink is an essential raw material. Section 5(3) of the K.G.S.T. Act provides for a reduced rate of tax @ 3%, payable by the dealer, in respect of sale of raw materials to industrial units, for use in the production of finished products, for sale in the State. The seller to the industrial unit can claim the benefit of payment of the reduced rate of tax, subject to the condition of furnishing a declaration, duly filled and signed by the purchasing dealer, in Form 18. So, the petitioner was purchasing the printing ink, by furnishing the necessary declaration in Form 18 and therefore, the selling dealer was paying tax only at the rate of 3%.

2. While so, the first respondent issued Ext.P1 notice, in respect of the assessment year 2000-01, purportedly under Section 45A of the K.G.S.T. Act, stating that purchase of ink by the petitioner at the concessional rate of



















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top