SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Ker) 287

K.A.ABDUL GAFOOR
C. H. Kunhikannan – Appellant
Versus
State Represented by the Public Prosecutor – Respondent


Judgment :-

The appellant/accused stands convicted for the offence punishable under Section 55(a) of the Abkari Act and he is sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a term of 2 years and to pay a fine of Rs.1 lakh with a default sentence to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months. This is under challenge in this appeal.

2. According to the prosecution case, at about 9.55 a.m. on 20/6/1998, PWs. 1 and 2 while on patrol duty on getting information about the transaction of banned arrack, found the accused in suspicious circumstances on the public road carrying a bit shopper (M.O.1). He was apprehended and questioned. It was found that big shopper (M.O.1) in his hand contained 48 packets of Karnataka made arrack measuring 100 ml. Each, which was banned in Kerala State. Accordingly the appellant/accused was arrested and Ext.P1 seizure mahazar was prepared. It is recorded therein that six packets from out of 48 were opened and poured in two bottles of 375 ml. The contents of three packets each were poured into each of the said bottles and were sealed. The entire things were seized and the seized articles were taken to the police station. Thereupon Ext.P3 FIR was registered an





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top