R.BHASKARAN, K.T.SANKARAN
Saramma Ittoop – Appellant
Versus
Kunjamma Kuruvilla – Respondent
Sankaran, J.
Defendants 2,3 and 5 is O.S.No.223 of 1990 on the file of the Court of Subordinate Judge of Moovattupuzha, challenge the preliminary judgment and decree of the trial court by which the plaintiffs were held entitled to 2/10 shares in the plaint schedule property and 2/10 shares in the rent received in respect of the buildings and defendants 2 to 5 were restrained from causing any obstruction to the plaintiffs in taking water from the plaint schedule property. It was also provided in the preliminary decree that as far as possible, partition should be effected without affecting the residence of defendants 2 to 5.
2. The plaint schedule property and the building therein belonged to Ittoop Kurian. He was a bachelor. Ittoop Kurian has three brother and five sisters, namely, Varghese, Kurivilla, Ittoop, Annamma Chacko, Sosamma Uthup, Mariamma, Aleyamma and Saramma Kuriakose. The plaintiffs are the daughter and widow of Kuruvilla. Sosamma Uthup died and her legal representative are since deceased P.U. Ittop and the 11th defendant P.U. Mathew. The legal representatives of P.U. Ittoop are defendants 2 to 5. Defendants 6 to 9 are the legal representatives of Mariamma. D
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.