SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Ker) 396

R.BASANT
T. K. Abdulla – Appellant
Versus
Subaida – Respondent


Judgment :-

Should a divorced Muslim woman be unable to maintain herself to entitle her to amounts under Section 3 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act? Is she entitled for any amount under Section 3(1)(b) on the ground that she herself had maintained children who are aged more than 2 years on the date of divorce? These interesting questions arise for consideration in this revision petition directed against an order passed under Section 3 of the Muslim Woman (protection of Rights on Divorce) Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act’). The order directs the petitioner herein/divorced husband to pay a total amount of Rs.2,73,000/- to the claimant, his divorced wife.

2. Marriage and divorce are admitted. Liability to pay maintenance during the period of Iddat is not disputed. Liability to make fair and reasonable provision and maintenance is also not disputed. There was a claim for deferred mahar payable at the time of divorce. There is dispute regarding the quantum of deferred mahar and also as to whether is any deferred mahar. Amounts were claimed under Section 3(1)(b) of the Act. The children were aged 12 years, 12 years and 10 years at the time of divorce. It

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top