SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Ker) 519

K.HEMA
Rajan @ Kannadi Rajan – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala, Rep by Public Prosecutor – Respondent


Judgment :-

This appeal arises from the order passed by the court below under Section 446 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (‘Code’, for short) directing the appellant to pay penalty of Rs.3,000/- and in default of payment of penalty and on exhausting the steps contained in Section 421 of the Code to undergo imprisonment in civil jail for a period of two months each.

2. The appellants are the sureties of an accused in a sessions case. They had executed a bond for Rs.25,000/- for appearance of the accused before the sessions court. On one particular day, the accused failed to appear and hence the court issued non-bailable warrant and notice against the sureties. A case was also registered against them and after giving sufficient opportunity to show cause, the appellants were directed to pay penalty. They were also directed to undergo imprisonment in civil jail for a period of two months. The said order is under challenge in this appeal filed under Section 449 of the Code.

3. On going through the order under challenge, I find that the order is per se illegal. It is seen from the order under challenge itself that there was no “default” on the part of the accused, which resulted in forfe







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top