SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Ker) 509

S.SIRI JAGAN, P.R.RAMAN, V.K.BALI
Sugathan – Appellant
Versus
Shahul Hameed – Respondent


Judgment :-

S. Siri Jagan, J.

When these Writ Appeals came up for hearing before a Division Bench of this Court, the Division Bench perceived a conflict between two earlier Division Bench decisions, one in W.A. No.1563/2001 and connected cases and the other in W.A. No.424/2000, on the same issue, which is under consideration in these Writ Appeals. The Division Bench, therefore chose to refer the matter for decision by a Full Bench. It is under the above circumstances that these Writ Appeals have come up for hearing before us.

2. The common issue involved in these cases is as to whether the Government Order, issued in G.O(Ms) No. 39/2001/TD dated 30-3-2001 ordering that, while applying the 1:1 ratio, now existing in the Kerala Excise and Subordinate Service Rules, for promotion to the category of Excise Preventive Officer from among Excise Guards possessing, the minimum qualification of SSLC and those who do not possess SSLC qualification, a senior Excise Guard, who possesses the minimum educational qualification of pass in SSLC or its equivalent, shall not be superseded by a junior Excise Guard who does not possess the qualification of pass in SSLC examination or its equivalent has t






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top