SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Ker) 546

R.BASANT
Pharma Kuries (P) Ltd – Appellant
Versus
T. J. Soju – Respondent


Judgment :-

Is section 5 of the Limitation Act applicable at all to a claim petition under Section 84(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure? This is the question of law raised in this revision petition directed against an order passed by the learned Magistrate dismissing a claim petition filed by the petitioner under Section 84(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

2. The leaned Magistrate dismissed the application on two grounds, namely the application has not been filed within the period of 6 months as stipulated in Section 84(1) Cr.P.C and that the right of the petitioner over the property attached has not been satisfactorily established.

3. To the skeletal facts first. A complaint was filed by the 2nd respondent herein against the 1st respondent alleging commission of an offence punishable under Section 138 of the N.I Act. The complaint was filed in 1997. Long later after completing all proceedings, the matter came up for judgment on 6.03.2000. From that date, the accused started absconding. He is not available to be apprehended even now. Steps to procure the presence of the 1st respondent were taken by the learned Magistrate and an item of property over which he has rights was at

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top