SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Ker) 498

K.HEMA
Tom Thomas – Appellant
Versus
Abdul Lathief – Respondent


Judgment :-

Can an order of dismissal passed under S.204(4) of the Code be treated as an order of acquittal? Can such order be challenged in an appeal, under S.378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure ('the Code’, in short)? These questions arise in this petition for leave to file an appeal under S.378(4) of the Code.

2. Petitioner filed a complaint alleging offence under S.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act before the Magistrate’s court. It was dismissed under S.204(4) of the Code, since petitioner failed to take steps after issuing warrant against the accused. Hence, petitioner has filed an appeal against the said order under S.378 of the Code, treating it as an order of acquittal. He also filed this petition for special leave to file appeal. The impugned order passed under 204 of the Code can be extracted hereunder:

“This case was called on for hearing today, to which it had been posted. The complainant has not taken steps in this case. Thereby, this complaint is dismissed u/s.204 of Cr.P.C.”

It is clear from the above order that the complaint was “dismissed” under S.204 of the Code. The relevant portion of S.204 of the Code reads follows:

“S.204. Issue of process.--

1) If in the opi


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top