SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Ker) 572

K.M.JOSEPH
K. V. Abdul Kader – Appellant
Versus
The Accounts Officer (ESTT) – Respondent


Judgment :-

Petitioner joined as part time contingent sweeper in the Government Mopila School, Kunhimangalam, Kannur District on 10.10.1964. On 12.2.1969 he was relieved from the said School. Thereafter, on 13.2.1969 he entered the service of the erstwhile Public health engineering Department as a Peon advised by Public Service Commission. Thereafter, he was absorbed by the Kerala Water authority and he retired on superannuation on 31.10.2002. His complaint is that though he is entitled to count fifty per cent of the part time contingent service which he rendered while he worked in the aforesaid School as qualifying service for pension, he is denied the said benefit. He made Ext.P1 representation which was rejected by Ext.P3. It is the case of the petitioner that even though the second respondent recommended to compute fifty per cent of the part time contingent service of petitioner as qualifying service and to revise his pensionary claim vide Ext.P4, that was rejected by third respondent by Ext.P5. Ext.P7 is a letter addressed by third respondent to the Chief Minister’s Public Grievance Cell stating that the petitioner’s claim cannot be considered for the reason that part time con







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top