Judges : V.K.BALI,KURIAN JOSEPH,K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR
John George - Appellant
Versus
Stewards Association in India - Respondent
Case No : A.F.A.No.1 of 2006 & 86 of 2002
Decided On : 09/27/2006
Advocates Appeared :
For the Appellant: S.V. Balakrishna Iyer, K. Jayakumar, V.R. Venkatakrishnan, Advocates. For the Respondent: P.N.K. Achan (Sr.Advocate), B. Krishna Moorthy, K. Mohana Kannan, V.N. Achutha Kurup, K. Harilal, Advocates.
Kerala High Court Act 1958 - Section 5(ii) - Civil Procedure Code, 1908 - Section 100A - Stewards Association in India, which is a society registered under the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act filed a suit for recovery of the possession of the plaint schedule property from the defendants and also for realisation of mesne profits at Rs.1,800/- per year - Burden of the plaint was that the plaint schedule properties were acquired by Adolph Kocher, a German Missionary as per registered documents of 1084 and 1088 M.E - Held, Court hold that the Full Bench decision of this Court in Kesava Pillai v. State of Kerala lays down the correct law and there is no occasion to differ with the same - Court answer the reference holding that S.100-A of Code of Civil Procedure bars an appeal to a Division Bench provided u/s.5(ii) of the Kerala High Court Act against a judgment of single Judge in the exercise of the appellate jurisdiction in respect of a decree or order made in the exercise of the original jurisdiction by a subordinate court and that such appeals filed after 1.7.2002 are not maintainable -Order Accordingly
V.K. Bali, C.J.
The Stewards Association in India, which is a, society registered under the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act filed a suit for recovery of the possession of the plaint schedule property from the, defendants and also for realization of mesne profits at Rs.1,800/- per year. The burden of the plaint, was that the plaint schedule properties were acquired by Adolph Kocher, a German Missionary as per registered documents of 1084 and 1088 M.E. He constructed a building for his residence and missionary work as a result of which a Brethem, Sabha was formed. There was a prayer hall in the building which was used as an orphanage after purchase, of the property by Kocher. Kocher was arrested during World War No.1 as he was a German citizen. He however, had gifted the property to Stewards Company Limited, England, which right was transferred to the plaintiff-Association in 1973 by a registered document. One Mr.Adams was staying in this property and was continuing the missionary work and administration of the orphanage. During 1976, Adams left for Australia for the treatment of his wife. The orphanage was described as a trust and the subject matter of the trust was only furniture and livestocks. The orphanage or its Superintendents have no right over the property. The first defendant was a member of the Brethern Mission. He volunteered to supervise the orphanage as a Member of the Mission as desired by Adams. When Adams came back to Irinjalakuda in 1978, he found various irregularities. He tried to rectify the same but had to go back to Australia. Though he had written to the inmates of the orphanage to treat the first defendant as a Superintendent, there was no transfer of right to the first defendant. The first defendant, however, on the strength of the letter-written by Adams on 29.12.1978 tried to make the property as his own, thus constraining the plaintiff to file a, suit for injunction (O.S.No.173 of 1984, originally numbered as OS 648/1982) which was pending. In the present suit, (OS No.176 of 1983), however, as mentioned above, the prayer was for recovery of possession on the strength of title with a prayer, for damages. The suit was contested on various grounds as would be reflected from the issues framed by the trial court. The two suits, it appears were consolidated and disposed of by a common judgment. The suit with regard to recovery of possession and realisation of mesne profits was decreed and the defendants were directed to surrender the suit property to the plaintiffs. However, the right of the defendants to manage the affairs of the orphanages till they are legally removed from the office was also recognised. The suit pertaining to injunction, bearing No. 173 of 1984 was also decreed and the defendants were restrained from obstructing the plaintiff from managing the orphanage until he was removed from office.
Constrained, the defendant arrayed in the original lis, filed an appeal which came up for final disposal before the learned Single Judge on 23rd October, 2003 and by a detailed judgment, the same was dismissed. Still dissatisfied, the defendants filed the appeal, A.F.A.No.1 of 2006.
2. The facts of the appeal (A.F.A.No.86 of 2002) filed by M/s. Sundaram Finance Limited, 21, Patullos Road, Madras, reveal that it had filed O.S.No.148 of 1988 before the Sub Court, Kollam on 26.5.1988 for recovering an amount of Rs.40,138/- with interest due under a hire purchase agreement. The defendant therein had entered into a hire purchase agreement with the plaintiff for purchase of a lorry and the plaintiff had financed the defendant a total amount of Rs.1,47,400/-, on the security of the lorry under the hire purchase agreement. The defendant failed to pay the installment amounts from 20.5.1984 and the plaintiff took custody of the vehicle and it was sold for an amount of Rs.85,000/-. After adjusting the amount repaid by the defendant as also the price recorded by the sale of the lorry, according to t
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.