SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Ker) 618

R.BASANT
Kairali Marketing And Processing – Appellant
Versus
Pullengadi Service Co-Operative – Respondent


Judgment :-

What precisely is the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act? On what date can the offence be held to be committed? These questions arise for consideration in these revision petitions which are directed against the concurrent verdicts of guilty, convictions and sentences imposed in two separate prosecutions between the same parties under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

2. The complainant in both these prosecutions is a Co- operative Society. The first accused in both cases is also a co-operative society. The second accused is the president of the first accused co-operative society, a named individual. The third accused is arrayed with the description that he is the secretary of the first accused Co-operative society. It is significant that the complaint is not against an individual acting as the Secretary. The third accused is shown as the Secretary of the Society. The incumbent functioning as the Secretary is not named as the third accused in either prosecution.

3. The prosecutions relate to four cheques for a total amount of Rs.5,21,147/-. The complainant contended that the cheques were issued for the due discharge of a legally enforc































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top