SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Ker) 695

Judges : KURIAN JOSEPH
K.M.Kuriakose - Appellant
Versus
The Registrar, M.G.U.& Others - Respondent
Case No : OP No.20230 of 2003
Decided On : 10/25/2006
Advocates Appeared :
For the Petitioner : --- For the Respondents: ---

Headnote:

Kerala State and Subordinate Service Rules 1958 - Rule 28(bbb) - What is crucial date for application of R.28(bbb) of the KS and SSR is the issue arising for consideration in this case - Whether a senior becoming eligible owing to exemption after the occurrence of the vacancy and after the examinations taken by his Juniors, conducted by the Public Service Commission but before the publication of the result is entitled to get promotion on the basis of exemption is the question to be tackled - Held, Petitioner is entitled for promotion with effect from 20.9.2000, it is declared that he shall also be entitled to consequential benefits with effect from that date in the cadre of Upper Division Clerk - If there was any vacancy after 20.9.2000 and in case there is no senior otherwise eligible, the 4th respondent shall be accommodated - Impugned orders to the extent required will stand quashed -consequential benefits including fixation and pension shall be made and disbursed to the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment - Original Petition Disposed of.

Judgment :-

What is the crucial date for application of Rule 28(bbb) of the KS and SSR is the issue arising for consideration in this case. Whether a senior becoming eligible owing to exemption after the occurrence of the vacancy and after the examinations taken by his juniors, conducted by the Public Service Commission but before the publication of the result is entitled to get promotion on the basis of exemption is the question to be tackled. The vacancy in the cadre of Upper Division Clerk arose under the respondent college on 1.3.1999. As on that date none in the feeder category of Lower Division Clerk was qualified. Petitioner attained the age of 50 years on 19.9.2000 and according to him, being exempted from test qualification he is entitled for promotion with effect from 20.9.2000. In fact the management promoted the petitioner with effect from 20.9.2000. Later, that was interfered with by the department on the ground that the 4th respondent got qualified on 14.7.2000, the day following the last day of the examination conducted by the Public Service Commission. The result of the examination was published only on 16.10.2000. According to the petitioner, the date of declaration of the result is the crucial date and only if the vacancy remained unfilled for want of qualified persons, the 4th respondent can stake a claim for promotion to the post with effect from the last date of the examination. According to the 4th respondent, the date of occurrence of vacancy being March 1999, by virtue of the deeming provision under Rule 28 (bbb) of the KS and SSR, it is he who first qualified on 14.7.2000, the day following the last date of the examination.

2. I am afraid the contention of the 4th respondent cannot be appreciated. Rule 28(bbb) to the extent relevant reads as follows:-

"Where a pass in any examination or test confers on a person the title to any right, benefit or concession, such title to the right, benefit or concession shall be deemed to have accrued - (a) in the case of a person who has passed such examination or test before the 14thAugust, 1971, on the day following the last day of such examination or test in the subject or subjects and (b) in the case of a person who has passed such examination or test on or after 14th August, 1971, on the day following the last day of the whole examination or test in which he has successfully completed the examination or test by passing one or more subjects.”

3. For application of Rule 28(bbb), the promotion should be to the post not involving a change of duty and the vacancies must remain unfilled for want of test qualified hands. In the event of a senior on the basis of the exemption under Rule 13-B of the Rules becoming eligible prior to the publication of the result, that senior has a right to be considered, on the day following the acquisition of eligibility viz. exemption from passing the test. The opening words of the Rule 28(bbb) would show that the pass in the test gives a right to be considered, subject to the other conditions indicated above. If the vacancy remains unfilled as on the date of publication of the result only, such person gets a right to be considered for promotion in the existing vacancy with effect from the last date of the examination. In other words, if there is no vacancy as on the date of publication of the result, that person has no right to be considered for promotion. Naturally there arises no question of any promotion with effect from the last date of the examination. The effect of deemed passing of the test is only to enable the person to claim promotion with effect from the last day of the examination, in case there is a vacancy remaining unfilled as on the date of the publication of the result. The result of the examination was published on 16.10.2000. By the time the petitioner had completed 50 years and thus he became eligible for promotion, being exempted from passing the test qualification. The moment the eligibility arises, petitioner has a r




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top