Judges : K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.M.JAMES
Vijayan - Appellant
Versus
Cochin Devaswom Board - Respondent
Case No : W.P. (C)Nos. 34886 of 2003 & 22426 of 2004
Decided On : 08/25/2004
Advocates Appeared :
M.P. Ashok Kumar, C.A. Chacko, C.M. Charisma & M. Sonya For Petitioner Chander, K. Ramachandran, N.N. Sugunapalan, Ranjith Thampan & K.A. Sanjeetha For Respondents.
Hindu Religious Institutions Act, 1950 (T.C.), Sections 62, 68 and 74 –Writ Petitions and applications are being filed by various Kshetra Kshema Samithies and devotees under Art.226 of the Constitution of India questioning the authority of the Board in the matter of administration and control of various temples vis-a-vis the Kshetra Kshema Samithies constituted under the bye-laws framed by the Board –Held, Writ Petitions cannot be entertained under Art.226 of the Constitution of India. Petitioners have no case that any of their fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution of India or statutory rights have been violated. Further no writ of mandamus would lie to give effect to the provisions of the bye-laws which are nonstatutory –Applications are disposed.
K.S.Radhakrishnan, J.
Rights, authority, jurisdiction and powers of the Cochin Devaswom Board in the matter of administration and management of the incorporated and unincorporated Devaswoms under the Travancore Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act (Act XV of 1950), and also the scope of the bye-laws framed by the Board for the constitution of the Kshetra Kshema Samithies are the issues which have come up for consideration before us in these cases.
2. Writ Petitions and applications are being filed by various Kshetra Kshema Samithies and devotees under Art.226 of the Constitution of India questioning the authority of the Board in the matter of administration and control of various temples vis-a-vis the Kshetra Kshema Samithies constituted under the bye-laws framed by the Board. Disputes and differences often arise out of the interpretation and application of various provisions of the Act and the bye-laws, giving rise to litigations before this Court and the Civil Courts and it is highly necessary to set right those issues to maintain peace and harmony between the devotees and for the smooth and effective administration of the temples under the Board.
3. W.P.(C) 34886/03 is filed by the devotee under Art.226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of mandamus directing the Board to conduct re-election to the Kshetra Kshema Samithy of Thriprayar Sree Ramaswami Temple after giving membership to all the devotees, after holding that the constitution of Kshetra Kshema Samithy is illegal and irregular. Petitioner has also sought for a declaration that respondents 4 and 5 are not eligible to hold the post in the Kshetra Kshema Samithy since they are not believers in temple worship. WP(C) 22426/04 is filed by a devotee and former Secretary of the Kshetra Kshema Samithy of Velappaya Mahadeva Temple seeking a writ of mandamus under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India directing the Board to take necessary action to convene the Annual General Body Meeting of the Kshetra Kshema Samithy for the year 2003-04. I.A.2523 of 2003 in CDB.9 of 2002 was filed by some of the devotees of Sree Kurumba Bhagavathy Temple, Kodungalloor for a direction to the Board and Sree Kurumba Kshetra Kshema Samithy to conduct election of office bearers and executive committee of the Kshetra Kshema Samithy after issuing notice to all the members and affording an opportunity to attend the general body meeting and also for other consequential reliefs. CDB. 9 of 2002 was registered on a complaint received from few devotees highlighting the deficiencies in the administration of the temple and its mismanagement. DBA 89/04 is an application filed by the Secretary of the Cochin Devaswom Board seeking permission of thisCourt to nominate the persons mentioned in the application as members of the Renovation Committee for attending the renovation works in the Sree Poornathrayeesa Temple, Tripunithura.
4. The Board has filed counter affidavit and statements in WP(C) No.34886 of 2003, reply statement in DBA. 89 of 2004 and also statements in CDB. 9 of 2002. Reply affidavits have also been filed by the parties. On going through the Writ Petitions, applications, counter affidavits and reply affidavits we have no hesitation to state that persons who are having varied interests are trying to squeeze into the various Kshetra Samithies for their personal interest, putting public interest and the interest of the administration at bay, resulting unrest among devotees, at times leading to clashes among devotees. Men and women of character, devotion, integrity and honesty are relegated to the background and undeserving persons are holding their grip in the management of the various Kshetra Kshema Samithies functioning in temples. Many of the devotees belonging to the former category are reluctant to come forward and take part in the affairs of the temple and persons who want to take capital out of that are at times in the forefront. Rather than extending a helping hand to th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.