SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Ker) 372

R.BASANT
T. M. Devi – Appellant
Versus
A. C. Haridas – Respondent


Judgment :-

Is a person who has not signed the cheque, nevertheless a joint holder of the account which can be operated by any of the account holders, culpably liable under Sec. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act? This is the short question that arises for determination in this revision petition.

2. The petitioner-a woman, has a joint account with the bank. She and her husband are competent to operate the account separately. The cheque in question was issued by her husband, the 1st accused. Such cheque was issued to the complainant for the discharge of a liability of the 1st accused. The cheque was dishonoured on the ground of insufficiency of funds. Notice of demand issued to both the accused did not succeed in securing payment. The petitioner herein (the 2nd accused) specifically asserted in the reply notice that she has no liability under Sec. 138 of the N.I.Act. The complainant filed a private complaint to initiate Criminal proceedings against both the accused under Sec. 138 of the N.I. Act. The learned Magistrate took cognizance. The petitioner rushed to this Court with Crl.M.C.No.3720/01 to quash the proceedings against her. That petition was dismissed with the observation





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top