THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN
Pazhukkamattom Devaswom – Appellant
Versus
Kunju Muhammed – Respondent
This Second Appeal is filed by the plaintiffs in a suit filed under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
2. This appeal is confined to the rights of the 7th defendant.
3. The necessary facts are as follows:
The suit was filed alleging mismanagement of the 1st plaintiff Trust. The trial Court passed a preliminary decree on 17-12-1993 for settling a scheme for the proper management and administration of the temple and its properties; declaring the right of the plaintiffs and the general public in the locality to participate in the management and administration of the temple, appointing a new trustee for the 1st plaintiff temple (Trust) and ordering removal of the 1st defendant trustee from the management of the temple and its properties; directing the 1st defendant to surrender all the documents and properties, movable and immovable, to the new trustees; declaring that the documents, Lease Deed No.1380/56. Release Deed No.2775/68, Sale Deed No.2776/68, Lease Deed No.2961/69, Mortgage Deed No.489/69, Mortgage Deed No.201/70 and Sale Deed No.3592/73 are null and void and not binding on the 1st plaintiff trust; directing the 1st defendant to account for the income of the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.