SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Ker) 301

K.PADMANABHAN NAIR
N. Ramachandran Potti – Appellant
Versus
Kumari Thankam K. K. – Respondent


Judgment :-

The first respondent in an unnumbered appeal presented before the District Court, Kottayam is the petitioner in this writ petition. The appeal was filed against the decree passed in O.S.291 of 1996 filed by the petitioner on the file of principal Subordinate Judge’s Court, Kottayam.

2. The first respondent filed O.S.291 of 1996 against the Kaliyammanada Kshethra Bharana Samithy, represented by its president, Secretary and also against his own brother. A compromise decree was passed in the suit on 18.7.1997. The respondents 1 to 4 filed I.A.257 of 2004 under Sec. 96(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking leave to file appeal and I.A.258 of 2004 under Sec. 5 of the Limitation Act for condoning the delay of 2417 days in filing the appeal. The learned District Judge heard both these applications together and allowed by a common order. The plaintiff-first respondent in the unnumbered appeal has filed this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the orders passed by the learned District Judge granting leave as well as condoning the delay.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has strenuously argued before me that while dealing with t







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top