SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Ker) 293

J.B.KOSHY, K.THANKAPPAN
Abdul Rahiman – Appellant
Versus
Rajan @ Rajakumaran – Respondent


Judgment :-

Koshy, J.

When the insurance company is directed to deposit the entire compensation awarded by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal and after satisfying the award insurance company is given the right to get reimbursement from the insured for violation of policy conditions etc. and that direction challenged in appeal filed by the co-respondent who is liable to reimburse the insurance company, whether he should deposit the amount as required under section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act is the question to be considered in this order.

2. Section 173 (1) of the Motor Vehicles Act reads as follows:

“173. Appeals:- (1) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (2), any person aggrieved by an award of a Claims Tribunal may, within ninety days from the date of the award, prefer an appeal to the High Court:

Provided that no appeal by the person who is required to pay any amount in terms of such award shall be entertained by the High Court unless he has deposited with it twenty-five thousand rupees or fifty per cent of the amount so awarded, whichever is less, in the manner directed by the High Court:

Provided further that the High Court may entertain the appeal after the expiry of the




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top