R.BASANT
K. Vasudevan – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
Is the proceedings under Section 200 Criminal Procedure Code “inquiry” an defined under Section 2(g) Criminal Procedure Code? Is the sworn statement recorded before the Magistrate under Section 200 Criminal Procedure Code, ‘evidence’? Can the affidavit filed under Section 145 of the N.I. Act be received by a court to proceed further without insisting on the personal appearance of the complainant? These questions of contextual relevance are thrown up for consideration in this revision petition.
2. The complainant, in a complaint under Section 138 of the N.I. Act, has preferred this revision petition against the order passed by the learned Magistrate “closing” the complaint. I extract below the impugned order:
“Complainant absent. It appears that complainant is not interested to proceed with this case. The Criminal. M.P. is closed”.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner first of all contends that a Criminal complaint cannot be disposed of with an order like the one extracted above. The Code of Criminal Procedure Speaks of termination of a complaint at the stage of 203 Criminal Procedure Code by dismissal. It does not permit closure of complaint, submits the counsel. I do
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.