SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Ker) 112

K.K.DENESAN, N.K.SODHI
Premlal – Appellant
Versus
Government of Kerala – Respondent


Judgment :-

N.K. Sodhi, C.J.

These three Writ Petitions have been put up for hearing before us on a reference made by a learned Single Judge. Since common questions of law and fact arise in these cases, they can be conveniently disposed of together. For the sake of convenience, facts are being taken from W.P. (C) No.5929 of 2004.

2. Petitioners are stage carriage operators carrying on their business of running stage carriages on different routes on the strength of permits granted to them by the Regional Transport Authority, Alappuzha. Petitioner No.1 applied for a regular stage carriage permit on Cherthala-Aroor temple route and made an application to the Regional Transport Authority, Alappuzha. The Regional Transport Authority considered the application in its meeting held on 9th October, 2003 and as per item No. 15 of its agenda, the application of the first petitioner was taken up for consideration and the same was granted subject to settlement of timings. Similarly, petitioner No.2 applied for a regular stage carriage permit on Chalipally-Chellanam route to the same Authority. His application was taken up for consideration by the Regional Transport Authority on 27th February, 200













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top